Union-Endicott Central School District – Building Access (S9-26-9)

Issued Date
August 14, 2026

[read complete report – pdf]

Audit Objective

Did Union-Endicott Central School District (District) officials properly manage and monitor building access accounts and devices?

Audit Period

July 1, 2024 – November 30, 2025

We extended our audit period to April 21, 2026, to review access activity logs.

Understanding the Audit Area

Building access controls are essential for enhancing security and enabling school officials to manage and monitor entry points within educational institutions. These systems authenticate a user through devices such as key fobs, key cards, badges, or similar technologies, helping to ensure only authorized individuals can enter school buildings. By limiting access in this way, schools can better safeguard their facilities and maintain a safe and secure environment for students, teachers, staff and visitors.

The District uses a building access management system (system) which included 1,675 active building access accounts (accounts) associated with 742 devices issued to current employees and 946 issued to non-employees including 447 shared devices.1 Each of the District’s seven school buildings has one public point of entry. Employees may also access the buildings through additional secured entry points, which require a device for entry.

Audit Summary

District officials did not properly manage and monitor building access accounts and devices (badges). As a result, there was a potential risk for unauthorized access to District school buildings, compromising building security and safety for students, teachers, staff and visitors. Specifically, of the accounts we reviewed, the District had active, but unneeded, accounts with assigned badges in the system:

  • 11 individuals had two or more badges, including five employees who were assigned two active badges, five non-employees who were assigned two active badges and one non-employee who was assigned three active badges. 
  • 19 individual non-employee badges were not deactivated when building access was no longer needed. 
  • 150 shared badges, including 35 badges for substitute teachers which officials could not locate, were no longer needed but remained active. This occurred because the monitoring process for these shared badges was inconsistent and because District officials did not review the necessity of shared badges until our audit inquiry. 

Although District officials had a process for adding accounts in the system for employees and non-employees, no one periodically reviewed active accounts to determine whether they were needed. Furthermore, these issues occurred because District officials did not develop written policies and procedures that clearly assign roles and define the responsibilities for managing and monitoring accounts or issuing badges.

This report includes four recommendations that, if implemented, will help District officials improve management and monitoring of building access accounts and badges. District officials generally agreed with our recommendations and their response is included in Appendix B.

This audit was conducted pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution and the Office of the New York State Comptroller’s (OSC’s) authority as set forth in Article 3 of the New York State General Municipal Law (GML). The audit’s methodology and standards are included in Appendix D.

The Board of Education (Board) has the responsibility to initiate corrective action. A written corrective action plan (CAP) that addresses the findings and recommendations in this report must be prepared and provided to OSC within 90 days, pursuant to Section 35 of GML, Section 2116-a (3)(c) of the New York State Education Law and Section 170.12 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. To the extent practicable, implementation of the CAP must begin by the end of the next fiscal year. For more information on preparing and filing the CAP, please refer to the OSC brochure, Responding to an OSC Audit Report, which was provided with the draft audit report. The CAP should be posted on the District’s website for public review.


1 A shared account or device is assigned to a user for a specific role or function but not assigned to a specific individual (e.g., vendors or first responders).