Did Town of Cohocton (Town) officials make purchases in accordance with Town policy, statutory requirements and good business practices?

District officials did not properly identify, report or implement needed remediation to reduce lead exposure in all potable water outlets as required by NYS Public Health Law and Department of Health (DOH) regulations.3 We determined 63 of the 146 (43 percent) water outlets we identified that students, staff and the public may have access to and could consume water from, were not sampled or properly exempted by District officials during Cycle Two. This occurred because District officials did not have a sampling plan to identify all water outlets for sampling or exemption.

The purpose of our budget review was to identify issues which impact the City of Yonkers’ financial condition in the current and future years.

We examined compensation totaling $449,510 that was paid to 40 of the District’s 239 clerical, custodial, maintenance, security and transportation employees that were paid a total of $19 million during the audit period. We determined District officials designed and implemented policies and procedures that ensured the compensation we examined was accurate. Therefore, this report does not contain recommendations.

School officials did not appropriately track, inventory and safeguard IT assets acquired or in use during the audit period. Officials did not maintain complete, accurate and up-to-date inventory records to properly account for IT assets. Although the Board-adopted financial policies and procedures manual (Policy) required the COO to ensure accurate inventory records were maintained to safeguard all assets, it did not provide detailed guidance for maintaining inventory records for most IT assets because the dollar amount of most IT assets do not individually meet the Policy’s inventory record-required threshold of $1,500 for fixed assets (including IT assets). In addition, the IT asset inventory was decentralized with multiple individuals and a service provider maintaining the inventory records which resulted in the records containing inconsistent information.

Determine whether any Livonia Central School District (District) officials had interests in District contracts that were not in compliance with the District’s code of ethics.

District officials did not ensure goods and services related to CIP contracts were competitively procured in accordance with the District’s procurement policies or GML. As a result, officials cannot ensure taxpayers the 12 CIP contracts entered into, and valued at approximately $36.6 million, were procured in the most prudent and economical manner and without favoritism.

The purpose of our review was to assess the North Amityville Fire Company’s (Company) progress, as of June 2024, in implementing our recommendations in the audit report released in April 2023.

District officials did not properly identify, report or implement needed remediation to reduce lead exposure in all potable water outlets as required by NYS Public Health Law and Department of Health (DOH) regulations. We determined 98 of the 303 (32 percent) water outlets we identified, that students, staff and the public may have access to and could consume water from, were not sampled or properly exempted by District officials during Cycle Two. This occurred because District officials did not have a sampling plan to identify all water outlets for sampling or exemption.

The Town Board (Board) and officials did not develop and adopt an IT contingency plan or breach notification policy, periodically test data backups or provide employees with security awareness training. Sensitive IT control weaknesses were communicated confidentially to officials. As a result, the Town’s IT systems and its personal, private and sensitive information (PPSI) may be accessible to unauthorized use, access and loss. Officials also have minimal assurance that in the event of a disruption or disaster (e.g., a ransomware attack), employees and other responsible parties would be able to react quickly and effectively to help resume, restore or repair critical IT systems or data in a timely manner.

District officials did not always procure goods and services in accordance with the statutory requirements set forth in GML or with the District’s procurement policies and procedures. When officials do not solicit competition during the procurement of goods and services, taxpayers have less assurance that purchases are made in the most prudent and economical manner and without favoritism.

Determine whether the Town of Rutland (Town) Town Clerk (Clerk) properly billed water and sewer charges.

District officials generally paid employees’ salaries and wages accurately during the period July 1, 2022 through October 10, 2024. We reviewed 35 employees’ salaries and wage payments totaling $417,720 and determined that District officials generally paid employees’ salaries and wages accurately during the period. We also determined that District officials did not adequately segregate duties or establish mitigating controls over the payroll processing. Without adequate segregation of duties or mitigating controls over payroll processing, errors and irregularities could occur and go unnoticed.

Determine whether the Town of Rutland (Town) Town Clerk/ Tax Collector (Clerk) recorded, deposited, remitted and reported all collections accurately and in a timely manner.

Determine whether Truxton Academy Charter School (School) officials accurately billed and collected tuition.

Determine whether the Amani Public Charter School (School) officials procured goods and services in accordance with established policies.

Determine whether Monroe No. 1 Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) officials ensured credit card charges were properly approved, supported and for appropriate BOCES purposes.

Determine whether Island Trees Union Free School District (District) officials maintained complete and accurate inventory records for and monitored the District’s capital assets.

District officials did not properly identify, report or implement needed remediation to reduce lead exposure in all potable water outlets as required by NYS Public Health Law and Department of Health (DOH) regulations. We determined 136 of the 410 (33 percent) water outlets we identified that students, staff and the public may have access to and could consume water from, were not sampled or properly exempted by District officials during Cycle Two. This occurred because District officials did not have a sampling plan to identify all water outlets for sampling or exemption.

District officials did not properly identify, report or implement needed remediation to reduce lead exposure in all potable water outlets as required by NYS Public Health Law and Department of Health (DOH) regulations.3 We determined 38 of the 180 (21 percent) water outlets we identified at select areas, that students, staff and the public may have access to and could consume water from, were not sampled or properly exempted by District officials during Cycle Two. This occurred because District officials did not have a sampling plan to identify all water outlets for sampling or exemption.